Page 1 of 1

Where is Bin Laden?

PostPosted: Fri Oct 31, 2008 5:12 pm
by que13x
So this Halloween I have to ask and see what others think about the scariest boogieman of them all

ImageImage

Osama Bin Laden.

http://www.fbi.gov/wanted/topten/fugitives/laden.htm

PostPosted: Fri Oct 31, 2008 9:13 pm
by farquezy
ah dead, his uncle, brother, and son all say he is dead

PostPosted: Fri Oct 31, 2008 10:01 pm
by que13x
How would you know? He is Arab you are Persian.

PostPosted: Sat Nov 01, 2008 4:45 am
by staxx
He's hiding in the white house, getting freaky with the first lady.

PostPosted: Sat Nov 01, 2008 7:01 am
by farquezy
que13x wrote:How would you know? He is Arab you are Persian.
huh?
well his son said on CNN him and his family haven't heard from bin laden for a long time and in "Where in the world is osama bin laden" his uncle says he is dead and many people believe he is as well.
Also the mere fact that he went to the hospital in Dubai shows that he had problems which could have led him to die

PostPosted: Sat Nov 01, 2008 8:23 am
by que13x
I see. I believe it.

So why does it seem like there is this hush hush about it? I mean the candidates are all taking about hunting down this SOB.

PostPosted: Sat Nov 01, 2008 8:32 am
by crait
He's dead.
He's been dead.
He was probably dead before 9/11.

PostPosted: Sat Nov 01, 2008 9:30 am
by Man1la
what if he was still alive and then moved to another country and hid there?

PostPosted: Sat Nov 01, 2008 10:59 am
by que13x
The real question is why are we hunting him down for 9/11 when the FBI doesn't even list him as being directly responsible for it.

PostPosted: Sat Nov 01, 2008 12:19 pm
by BKFraiders7
Obama is really Bin Laden......but shaved ;)

PostPosted: Sun Nov 02, 2008 9:56 am
by crait
Lmao.
And Osama was supposed to be the government's scapegoat for 9/11.
That's why we're hunting him down.
He was on the most wanted list by the CIA for a long, long time.

PostPosted: Sun Nov 02, 2008 1:47 pm
by 8-bit_ninja
farquezy wrote:
que13x wrote:How would you know? He is Arab you are Persian.
huh?
well his son said on CNN him and his family haven't heard from bin laden for a long time and in "Where in the world is osama bin laden" his uncle says he is dead and many people believe he is as well.
Also the mere fact that he went to the hospital in Dubai shows that he had problems which could have led him to die
That's the family acting to protect someone they love/hold in high regard. I've always thought that he was just a fall guy for some other group, taking advantage of our misaccusation. I really have no clue, I don't think anybody does.

PostPosted: Sun Nov 02, 2008 4:11 pm
by que13x
I lean towards falsely accused/dead.

I mean sure Osama is guilty of some things but as stated by the FBI, not 9/11.

The so called confession video tape along with others have been declared forgeries http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/co ... 03_pf.html by intel experts but no one really looks into it.

Think about it, as much as Bin Laden supposedly seemed to like to gloat there have been no tapes delivered to Al-jezeera in years. Supposedly Osama released a tape in 2004 Bush vs Kerry http://www.cnn.com/2004/WORLD/meast/10/ ... index.html but he has nothing to say (assuming that was really him on the tape) about this historic election? Yet people still insist that Bin Laden is alive and still hiding. The special task force set up to locate this man was disbanded years ago, http://www.nytimes.com/2006/07/04/washi ... intel.html why would that be done if there was any suspicion this man were still alive?

The entire justification for the Iraq war did not make sense to me at the time. All of the so called evidence used to justify it has been discounted by many inducing the Pentagon. http://www.csmonitor.com/2007/0406/p99s01-duts.html We should have pulled out when this became public and held the responsible parties to account but for whatever reason people care more about the state of Iraq than the state of their own home nation.

Where we should focus on the war on terror is not Iraq or Afghanistan we should look to Saudi Arabia where 15 out of 19 hijackers were from. 3 Saudi nationals had Florida licenses with US Navy air base addresses on them http://old.911digitalarchive.org/crr/documents/1128.pdf The same base where American millitary pilots are trained to fly. Not a single hijacker was from Iraq nor has a single paper out of hundreds of thousands that have been located in Iraq suggested a link with Al-Qaeda in fact the papers suggest that Saddam hated Al-Qaeda http://www.cnn.com/2008/US/03/13/alqaeda.saddam/ as much as Americans hated Saddam. That fact alone should raise flags with people.

To really get a feel for where I am headed with this you have to read up on the history of the CIA and the ties the Saudi Royals have with the Bush family to really understand what is wrong with the official story. If you are interested try this for starters: http://www.slate.com/id/2103239/entry/2103433/

I think that if more people cared we could get the truth out and hold the ones that are truly responsible to account. Believe it or not the 9/11 commission report shows who shares in the responsibility and guilt but the truth is so astonishing few are willing to accept it.

Sorry for not providing Youtube links. That is not my job.

PostPosted: Fri Nov 07, 2008 2:47 pm
by DoctaMario
que13x wrote:I lean towards falsely accused/dead.

I mean sure Osama is guilty of some things but as stated by the FBI, not 9/11.

The so called confession video tape along with others have been declared forgeries http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/co ... 03_pf.html by intel experts but no one really looks into it.

Think about it, as much as Bin Laden supposedly seemed to like to gloat there have been no tapes delivered to Al-jezeera in years. Supposedly Osama released a tape in 2004 Bush vs Kerry http://www.cnn.com/2004/WORLD/meast/10/ ... index.html but he has nothing to say (assuming that was really him on the tape) about this historic election? Yet people still insist that Bin Laden is alive and still hiding. The special task force set up to locate this man was disbanded years ago, http://www.nytimes.com/2006/07/04/washi ... intel.html why would that be done if there was any suspicion this man were still alive?

The entire justification for the Iraq war did not make sense to me at the time. All of the so called evidence used to justify it has been discounted by many inducing the Pentagon. http://www.csmonitor.com/2007/0406/p99s01-duts.html We should have pulled out when this became public and held the responsible parties to account but for whatever reason people care more about the state of Iraq than the state of their own home nation.

Where we should focus on the war on terror is not Iraq or Afghanistan we should look to Saudi Arabia where 15 out of 19 hijackers were from. 3 Saudi nationals had Florida licenses with US Navy air base addresses on them http://old.911digitalarchive.org/crr/documents/1128.pdf The same base where American millitary pilots are trained to fly. Not a single hijacker was from Iraq nor has a single paper out of hundreds of thousands that have been located in Iraq suggested a link with Al-Qaeda in fact the papers suggest that Saddam hated Al-Qaeda http://www.cnn.com/2008/US/03/13/alqaeda.saddam/ as much as Americans hated Saddam. That fact alone should raise flags with people.

To really get a feel for where I am headed with this you have to read up on the history of the CIA and the ties the Saudi Royals have with the Bush family to really understand what is wrong with the official story. If you are interested try this for starters: http://www.slate.com/id/2103239/entry/2103433/

I think that if more people cared we could get the truth out and hold the ones that are truly responsible to account. Believe it or not the 9/11 commission report shows who shares in the responsibility and guilt but the truth is so astonishing few are willing to accept it.

Sorry for not providing Youtube links. That is not my job.


Quoted for the f**k TRUTH!

Everyone should re-read this post. I would bet that Bin Laden was actually working with the CIA on 9/11. With all the things we can do in terms of satellite capability and surveillance, if we REALLY wanted to find Bin Laden, we would ahve found him by now. The thing that makes me think that he was on the US Govt. payroll is the footage of Bush claiming that he "wasn't concerned with him." That was a very telling couple of seconds. What happened to him being enemy #1 and someone "has to pay for 9/11?" Not concerned?

We're in Iraq because they have valuable resources, not because we want to "spread democracy," "bring freedom" or any other TM bullish people want to say. The reason we aren't in Africa is because they don't have anything we need. Our government has used bait and switch tactics before to get us involved in wars (see Vietnam) so we shouldn't be surprised.

PostPosted: Sat Nov 08, 2008 5:54 pm
by crait