Brewology

Posted: **Sat Nov 08, 2008 5:53 pm**

From: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Osama_bin_Laden

No, go look at this: http://www.jannah.org/articles/sins.html
Scroll down to #56 and read that little scentance.

You decide.
Is this guy really Osama? Would someone who believes in Islam so powerfully that he would create a terroristic act to start a Ji-Had not really care about the 70 major sins of Islam?
That's like being the Pope and raping kids and admitting to it.

EDIT:
Lolzerz. # 2 is murder.

Posted: **Thu Nov 13, 2008 10:53 pm**

1998 Osama bombs embassy in Africa
January 2000: Former President Bush Meets with bin Laden Family on Behalf of Carlyle Group http://www.globalresearch.ca/articles/WAL110A.html
2000 Clinton administration observes Bin laden, refuses to take action.
September 11, 2001 15 Saudi nationals hijack planes. Bin Laden is ultimately blamed despite lack of direct credible evidence.
September 14-19, 2001:Potential witnesses associated with Bin Laden Family Members, Saudi Royals Quietly Leave US. http://web.archive.org/web/200109271249 ... S%2B.shtml
2004 Clinton,Bush and others testify to 9/11 commission but refuse to do so under oath. http://www.cnn.com/2004/ALLPOLITICS/04/ ... index.html 911 commission report
2006 CIA disbands Bin Laden hunter unit.

I think what is presented here shows a treasonous conspiracy at the highest levels. 3000+ lives were lost on September 11 and as of yet no justice at all. More US soldiers have been killed fighting the war on terror than there were people killed in the initial attacks!

On the surface it seems we the public have been lied to. I am trying to make sense of it all. Can anyone help?

Posted: **Fri Nov 14, 2008 8:24 am**

que13x wrote:1998 Osama bombs embassy in Africa
January 2000: Former President Bush Meets with bin Laden Family on Behalf of Carlyle Group http://www.globalresearch.ca/articles/WAL110A.html
2000 Clinton administration observes Bin laden, refuses to take action.
September 11, 2001 15 Saudi nationals hijack planes. Bin Laden is ultimately blamed despite lack of direct credible evidence.
September 14-19, 2001:Potential witnesses associated with Bin Laden Family Members, Saudi Royals Quietly Leave US. http://web.archive.org/web/200109271249 ... S%2B.shtml
2004 Clinton,Bush and others testify to 9/11 commission but refuse to do so under oath. http://www.cnn.com/2004/ALLPOLITICS/04/ ... index.html 911 commission report
2006 CIA disbands Bin Laden hunter unit.

I think what is presented here shows a treasonous conspiracy at the highest levels. 3000+ lives were lost on September 11 and as of yet no justice at all. More US soldiers have been killed fighting the war on terror than there were people killed in the initial attacks!

On the surface it seems we the public have been lied to. I am trying to make sense of it all. Can anyone help?

all this means to me is because of billary`s crappy presidency, we weree launched into a war that didn`t need to be started. dumbass democrats.

Posted: **Fri Nov 14, 2008 11:47 am**

Billary?
I'm sure it was Bush who started the war on terrorism.

Posted: **Sat Nov 15, 2008 3:41 pm**

Actually it was BOTH.

The Democrat "Billary" for permitting Bin Laden to run free when he could have been apprehended so many times between 1993 and 2000.

AND

The Repbulican Bush for selling the idea that Al-Qaeda headed by Bin Laden from a cave command center in Afghanistan, was training in Iraq to deliver destruction and violence to the world.

So you see, it was a bipartisan effort.

Odd how there is little mention of this oil pipleline in the mainstream which is intended to deliver the sludge to the Caspian sea.
http://www.newhumanist.com/oil.html

Posted: **Sat Nov 15, 2008 6:59 pm**

crait wrote:Billary?
I'm sure it was Bush who started the war on terrorism.

this is a load of conspiracy bull sh*t- this started long before bush-bill clinton-the democrats have almost complete control of military operations, and have done nothing to help. all to make republics look like asses. i hate political parties. democrats,republican-green-wtf? i believe it was george washington who said " this is an outrage! you and your PARTIES, they are a battle ground of words in which no one will win. this battle pits not americans and foreners, but americans and americans against each other. these parties will one day leed to the seperation of this great country that is america"--having said this, de you remember when the south broke away? yeah, political f-in parties. I rest My Case.

Posted: **Sun Nov 16, 2008 10:32 am**

How is that conspiracy BS?
Seriously, George Bush got us into the war.
He's the Commander In Cheif, that's his job.
It's not a conspiracy.
Anyone with the IQ of 6 or more will tell you that.

PLEASE STAY ON TOPIC, GUYS!

This topic is about your opinion if the guy in the picture is Bin Laden or not based on the data I presented.

Posted: **Sun Nov 16, 2008 11:14 am**

crait wrote:How is that conspiracy BS?
Seriously, George Bush got us into the war.
He's the Commander In Cheif, that's his job.
It's not a conspiracy.
Anyone with the IQ of 6 or more will tell you that.

PLEASE STAY ON TOPIC, GUYS!

This topic is about your opinion if the guy in the picture is Bin Laden or not based on the data I presented.

i said your comment is BS because of what i said abouve-how bout you read it ALL- no what? i hate politics, so dont reply- i wont answer. i pissess me off.

Posted: **Sun Nov 16, 2008 11:37 am**

There have been so many forgeries presented in support of the war on terror that I don't think anyone outside of the inner circle really knows for sure.

I will say that if Saddam had body doubles why not Bin Laden?

Posted: **Mon Nov 17, 2008 12:46 pm**

He wouldn't have a non-Islamic body double.
Why?
He hates non-Islamic?

Brewology

Fake Osama Bin Laden

Fake Osama Bin Laden