Madden PSP Slim -> CFW?
Posted: Thu Nov 27, 2008 12:54 pmCan the Madden PSP edition run CFW?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bh7iTSxE ... re=related
Page 1 of 1
Posted: Thu Nov 27, 2008 12:54 pmPosted: Thu Nov 27, 2008 1:18 pmPosted: Sat Nov 29, 2008 12:35 amI've gotten questions about this too. However, I've heard that with the 3000 the new board makes MMS unusable. Is this the same issue for the 2000s or can I still use DCv7 on it?
Posted: Sun Nov 30, 2008 4:42 pmAlso, can the God of War psp be hacked? I just got one two days ago.
Posted: Sun Nov 30, 2008 5:03 pmI think certain ones can be.
Posted: Sun Nov 30, 2008 5:06 pmIs there a way to tell?
Posted: Sun Nov 30, 2008 5:06 pmput a pandora battery and MMS in the psp and see if anything happens.
Posted: Sun Nov 30, 2008 6:10 pmhttp://psp.brewology.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=14726
brentbizzle wrote:Here's some information that can help (taken from Maxconsole). This will help you judge what version the PSP is by looking at the retail box. Some of it is still not absolute, so buyer beware... but this is all the information known at the present. It's separated by the package style:
PSP-2000 Motherboard Information:
TA-85 (Can use and make Pandora Battery)
TA-85v2 (Can use, but cannot make Pandora Battery)
TA-88v2 (Can use, but cannot make Pandora Battery)
TA-88v3 (Cannot use or make Pandora Battery)
Limited Edition & New Boxstyle:
Daxter Limited Edition Pack (TA-85v2/3.71 OFW)(CONFIRMED)
God of War Limited Edition Pack (TA-88v2/3.95 OFW)(CONFIRMED)
Madden 09 Limited Edition Pack (TA-88v2/3.95 OFW & TA-88v3/4.01 OFW)(CONFIRMED)
Piano Black with the New Box Style (TA-88v3)(UNCONFIRMED)
Piano Black (Amazon.com)(TA-88v3)(PARTIALLY CONFIRMED)
PSP-2000 Original Boxstyle Box Codes (Thanks to Alek @ Dark-AleX.org):
(No Letter) = 3.60
A = 3.71
B = UNKNOWN
C = 3.72
D = UNKNOWN
E = 3.80
F = 3.90
G = 3.95 / 4.01 (TA-88v2 / TA-88v3) BUT
A PSP with G and the 4.01 firmware is most likely a TA-88v3 motherboard, so it is advised that you stay away from them.
Posted: Sun Nov 30, 2008 7:07 pmThanks, Brent.