3.03OE-C VS. 3.40OE-A dum dum dum

[ace]

Why theres a 3.03OE-C vs. 3.10OE-A' thread and not one of these, I don't know. Must be one of lifes greatest mysteries. But yea who likes what? I like 3.40OE-A obviously

They are both equal but only both have little differences.

I like 3.03OE-C because of the customization. But they (like i said) are equal because they both do the same thing but you can do more on 3.03OE-C.

well i just upgraded to 3.40 oe-a but i dont like it some of my plugins dont run, i cant use all my cool oe-c customizers or apps (oviosly).
but i literaly just got on the comp to go back to 3.03 oe-c

3.40 oe-a. You can customize it, and you get the features of 3.4 (not much) and the stuff dark alex added

3.40 OE-A for the win!

You can basically do anything and everything that the 3.03 OE-C can dish out, plus more!

3.40oe-a rules, it has all the features of 3.03oe-c plus...

I've heard some people say that 3.03 OE-C is more stable than 3.40 OE, but it may just be bullsh. Either way, I'm happy with 3.03-c and dont' see a need to upgrade.

they both seem really good though...

All Iv'e heard is that 3.03 makes is easier to customize the XMB (which I'm not gonna do anyway) and that it's more stable. Other than that...the differences seem minimal, but I think some of the apps I have will only run on 3.03-C

3.03 oe-c...because its been good enough for me and the only real changes from 3.03 oe-c to 3.40 oe-a are better psx emulation and the auto boot feature is fixed. Both of which i hardly use anyway.

well I heard some higher custom firmwares than 3.03oec had some problems with psx games.

[ace]

I always heard the opposite. Anything above 3.03 will have better psx emulation, which seems like common sense. It is sony who built in the psx emulation so naturally it would get better in later firmwares.

well I'm probably gonna upgrade, since I don't really care that much about customizing, all I want is the games.