A Lesson About Forum Posting:

[DarkPacMan77]

Well, next time I complain, I hope that you take me as seriously as you would other people and listen to me as you would others.

As soon as I was notified, I took the picture down within 2 hours. I let your picture, which was much more pointless and absurd stay up for almost 19 hours. So... if you think everything is unfair... that's terribly biased.

You, one person, complained and got your issue resolved fairly promptly. 5+ people contact me and complain and I let your picture stay up much longer.

-DarkPacMan77-

[crait]

Well, next time I complain, I hope that you take me as seriously as you would other people and listen to me as you would others.

He did he took off what the over guy did.
and then you asked to do what the other guy did.
i cant beleive you dont get why DPM is making a example of you.

No, you don't know the whole of the story. He said he wouldn't for the longest time.
Hour and a half, it seemed. That was just of me complaining. It seems like as soon as someone finally contacted him about it, he did it straight away.
I complained and he didn't listen. The reason he changed his mind about it was because I said I was going to do what he did

It's an avatar.

Who cares?

Actually, ignore that I know both of you will shell out another reason.

Actually, ignore that I know both of you will shell out another reason.

Lol, don't get stuck in the middle

I would like this to be locked, because what originaly was ment for this topic has gone offboard.

[DarkPacMan77]

I'm on a 45 minute skype call with Alex and we've been discussing this for a long time prior to the phone call. Also, a moderator contacted me about this... Fri Nov 13, 2009 3:32 pm. I let it go for 5 hours. I took the other one down in under 2 hours. If you want to say that I'm being biased about this stupid topic... then at least consider the actual facts first. I waited two and a half times longer in YOUR FAVOR than I did when YOU complained about the stupid mouse.

-DarkPacMan77-

Well, not to be nosey or anything, but who all complained?

[DarkPacMan77]

Well, not to be nosey or anything, but who all complained?

One staff member and five regular forum members.

-DarkPacMan77-

That would be almost everyone that got on during that timeframe.

well of members who actually post and contribute.

[DarkPacMan77]

That would be almost everyone that got on during that timeframe.

Exactly, and that's why this is a problem. Only crait complained about this other member named toolman who had been a member for about 10 months and had 9 posts and crait's issue was resolved how he intended to be resolved in in less than 2 hours. I let crait's stay up for 19 hours myself after personally knowing about it and let it stay up for 5 hours after my staff notified me about it. See... crait wanted to post up his avatar after complaining about the mickey mouse one... that nobody recognized for 10 months... and now that "nearly everyone that got on" during the time that crait had his new avatar is complaining... I find it SIMPLY AMAZING that he is questioning whether or not he was treated fairly during this whole ordeal.

The bottom line is this. Both are taken down.

-DarkPacMan77-

I think there is more to the story, obviously he wouldn't keep arguing if that were the 100% situation.

I think there is more to the story, obviously he wouldn't keep arguing if that were the 100% situation.

Believe me that is 100% of the situation, crait just can't see why he is in the wrong.

crait is more logical than that.

What im thinking is that crait told DPM about the mouse avatar, and DPM didn't really acknowledge it as a problem, so crait changed his to the obvious to get a point across, and doesn't see how it's fair how one member could have something we couldn't and it wouldn't be acknowledged.

My belief is that Possession is 9/10's of the law, they both had whack avatars.

crait is more logical than that.

What im thinking is that crait told DPM about the mouse avatar, and DPM didn't really acknowledge it as a problem, so crait changed his to the obvious to get a point across, and doesn't see how it's fair how one member could have something we couldn't and it wouldn't be acknowledged.

My believe is that Possession is 9/10's of the law, they both had whack avatars.

if he didn't acnologit as a problem why did he sort it out in 2 hours but took 19 hours to do craits when people 13 hours from the moment someone complained, and it took 10 months for the other guys to get reconized.
so 1 complaint = 2 hours but 6 = 13?
and then crait basicly did what the mouse guy did yet crait was asking dpm to take it off in the first place so crait is complety contridicting himself because 19 hours ago he was telling dpm to take this kindof S**t off.

if there are any uncensored swear words please as its 2:30 and im tired.
Whats needed to be said has been said, anymore is just fueling the fire, and you lot don't seem to get the point.
i don't want to seem dogma but crait your being a idiot and as you dpm told you, you rule breakers.

Like I said, I believe there's more to the story, What I said is what I think happend, I don't think it got taken down then, because he wouldn't be complaining.