crait wrote:The reason I've been repetitive with my rebuttals is because I believe that he is making the same mistake over and over. I believe that this is why others are echoing their viewpoints and reading this thread from the most recent 10 pages, I'd say it would seem like we're being a tad harsh to him because we keep saying the same thing over and over as if we're not even reading his posts.
No disrespect, but that's how I view the situation and I believe that is why others are, too.
No disrespect taken and please none is intended with this next post but I am outside the box yourself and others are in it looking outward (OH and the lid is closed) but it doesn't matter as long as you are happy.
I assume you all have read the bible (seriously read the bible) but I also conclude than none of you have taken any consideration towards other religious works even the so called "Mythologies" which at some point were taken as seriously as Christianity is today. This is why you don't see my points, you lack the foundation that I have which also includes a good dose of world history (it helps more than you think).
For example (an extreme one) I assume you wouldn't touch a Satanic bible because of your fear of what could happen if you did (possession by demons perhaps?

Seriously?). I don't have this encumbrance (It's just a stack of paper!) I am not superstitious and I feel that is why you fail to see what I am trying to show all of you.
Some of you conclude that I am an astrologer of sorts; I am not. I couldn't recite a complete zodiac without looking it up just like most of you couldn't name all 10 commandments without looking them up(Let's be honest here). The difference? I don't call myself anything but open minded and a free thinker. That's just a comment not a judgment.
Mostly @ crait:
Allow me to illustrate my entire
mistake in a different way.
I know people that pray to gods that have many arms or blue skin. You may even go as far as calling those gods DEMONS (Let that though soak in for a minute....) Do you realize that the bible doesn't describe a single demon? (Please correct me if I am wrong) So how would anyone know one if they saw one? One of these blue skinned gods is named
Krishna. Krishna was spiritually conceived (no physical contact) just like Jesus but 3000 years before. Don't you find it striking that another god from another culture was born without intercourse? It's a fair question to ask or do you dismiss this all together as irrelevant or accept as I do that this born without sex theme is not original and has been around for a while?
Continuing the
mistake...
Krishna's life was in danger at birth just like Jesus (and Moses) but unlike Jesus, Krishna was raised by foster parents, just like Moses. Irrelevant or recycled? By the way, Moses came 1500 years or so
after Krishna.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moses#Date_of_the_Exodus I vote recycled.
Similarities don't just happen in religion either, Hollywood does it too!
Oh Brother Where Art Thou follows the tale of Homer’s Odyssey very closely (not perfectly). Homer's tale is set in ancient Greece, the Hollywood version is set in the deep south around the 1930s. Can you now see that borrowing themes or ideas is as old as people have been telling stories about one another?
So to summarize my point and hopefully satisfy
your misunderstanding, you have to be blind or in willful denial not to see the borrowed themes from other cultures and belief systems in religion. None of the tales in the bible are original. They are composites of much older tales sometimes of stories in the bible itself (compare Jesus and Joseph from Genesis sometime if you haven't already).
I don't know how to "elaborate" more clearly for you perhaps that is truly
my mistake.
Your
mistake crait, your
mistake, is not reading other religious books and educating yourself on the topic at hand.
This last part applies to everyone (not just religion).
It is much easier to openly dismiss than it is to verify for yourself and that is a grave
mistake in itself.
The programmers you will one day be looking to hire are the ones reading the tech news sites right now.
And they will remember...
~George Hotz @ $ony