Official Religion Debate Thread

In the World Government you will lose the majority of your civil rights. And there is no getting out of a One World Rule, since everyone is in, so there is no getting out. I read the constitution and their types of punishment are like

forbid you from natural resources and food
take away your money
automatically ruin your credit history
or isolation (they ship you off to some far off place and let you die in the desert or some snow mountain probably)

And I already told ya that there will be no guns, only the UN policeman will have them. I haven't looked at it in a while but it is about the worst thing that could happen to this world.
Oh yea: The head honchos will be hand picked from special "breeding schools" were people are raised to think exactly like the people in the back want them to think. There are hardly times were you can elect an official, if you can elect an official then it is a very low spot and the decisions they make can easily be overturned by the people who were hand picked and breeded in the special facility.
There is already a pledge for the government, ayou pledge to the earth that gives us life and all that. And if you don't say the pledge then you will be punished.. I mean that is some pretty messed up stuff.

but yah i already know this
Its weird though, because it can actually be good you know?
it makes all the hate go away
people all think the same way, preventing fights and war

But i just think its wrong, its taking human nature away.
It takes away our right to think for ourselves

Even though it can be good for human race over all, its just not right!

Yea it can be good, but I think my country is good the way it is. If only there weren't stupid gangs and stuff "protecting their rep" and shooting each other.

lets get back to religon and put that on the gov. debate thread

yah, isnt there like, a government thread?

[DarkPacMan77]

Well I kinda have an open question about religion mixed with politics. See, I probably only turn on my TV fewer than 10 times a month. Half of that time, I may watch a half hour of TV. I'm really someone who can say that they just don't watch TV... pretty rare in today's society, I think. Buuuuttttttt.... when I DO watch TV, I tend to watch [corrupt] shows like The O'Rielly Factor and other equally IQ-lowering programs of the such.

My question is: How can someone be allowed on national television, like Bill O'Rielly? - and, doesn't he appear to draw 99% of the conclusions on his show solely based off of his own religiously Republican-based opinions instead of listening to his guests?

WHY?!? do I watch that garbage? I don't know. I am a non-religious Democrat, for the most part. That's not to say that I will stay Democrat, vote Democratically, or anything of the such, just to clear that up... but it just seems to me that religion should never cross into politics... doing so can cause friendly people to turn radical. I'm not simply outcasting an entire people here, but take for example, radical Islamist values. Whether different from what you or I believe, is not the point. What's important to think about is that religion is deeply rooted in extremist or radical Islamist values.

Why isn't there a more literal enforcement of "separation of church and state"? We don't want to become a nation of violence and religious bigotry, so why do we allow our televisions to be flooded with that content?

-DarkPacMan77-

Yea I don't mind if it is separate. ANYBODY can have a show nowadays. There were like 7 reality shows going on at one time in MTV and VH1. And it takes people like 4 seasons of trying to find love on tv only to find out that they are wasting their time. Yea, I could probably have a show if I wanted to just to hate on things like Peter's "You know what really grinds my gears?" on Family Guy.

[DarkPacMan77]

Like... it's ok to be Republican. It's ok to be Democrat. It's ok to be religious, and it's also ok to be a combination of some or all of those entities. But Bill O'Rielly only shouts over people and repeats religious and Republican banter time and time again. He even does it to Republican guests on the show.

Just listen to how many times in 30 minutes he makes references Democrats by saying things like, those "loons" to the "far left", "crazy left", "pinhead left-wingers", and my favorite, "Democratic elitists". I heard him say that one when he was talking about a college's chancellor once... like... "lolwut Bill?".

-DarkPacMan77-

Lol, well I've never watched the show. It bugs me when people yell over you when you are trying to get a point across. You're like stfu! I might check it out sometime.

todays TV is full of stupid sh*t dude
i cannot stand watching TV
its soooo stupid, from those use less reality shows to that Bill O'reailly the most retarded person ever

TV is the best brainwash tool, i barely watch it. Instead of increasing their knowledge, people watch Tila Tequila try to find LOVE between 15 men and 15 women

WTF??
what kind of show is that?

and i hate when people mix religion with politics, it all started with them Free Masons, i hate them !!!!

TV, is a source of entertainment.

85% of things on TV sbouldn't be taken seriously
61% of people who view that 85% of garbage take it seriously
22% of people who view that garbage Detest it and Flame the creators while watching it constantly.
15% watch it for the enjoyment of watching it.

15% of stuff on TV should be taken seriously.

35% is on the Discovery channels.
15% is on News networks.
45% is on PBS.
5% just floats around randomly.

I'm apart of the 15% that watches it for entertainment.

[BKFraiders7]

Let me fix that for you Rox..

Youtube, is a source of entertainment.

85% of things on Youtube sbouldn't be taken seriously
61% of people who view that 85% of garbage take it seriously
22% of people who view that garbage Detest it and Flame the creators while watching it constantly.
15% watch it for the enjoyment of watching it.

15% of stuff on Youtube should be taken seriously.

, you slammed Mr. Youtubrewer...

Regarding this post.

You know... if we're able to make the "dust" on the surface of Mars capable of growing grass and shrubs... we would effectively be producing more oxygen there. If oxygen was more abundant on Mars, it could create alternate life forms. We, the human race, would therefor be responsible for the creation of alternate life forms on an otherwise "lifeless" planet (from what we understand today).

Humans can make life. They can clone life. They can genetically alter life. And now we may bring alternate life to the planet Mars. It's a breakthrough all right, to say the least. I just find it interesting that I don't see any major religious organizations opposed to this kind of science publicly.

-DarkPacMan77-

im the only catholic i kno that has no problem with cloning or the creation of life..... luvkily i make up for it with severe homophobia ....plz dont post anything else religous after this it is mostly a joke

What is wrong with cloning life / altering it?

Regarding this post.

You know... if we're able to make the "dust" on the surface of Mars capable of growing grass and shrubs... we would effectively be producing more oxygen there. If oxygen was more abundant on Mars, it could create alternate life forms. We, the human race, would therefor be responsible for the creation of alternate life forms on an otherwise "lifeless" planet (from what we understand today).

Humans can make life. They can clone life. They can genetically alter life. And now we may bring alternate life to the planet Mars. It's a breakthrough all right, to say the least. I just find it interesting that I don't see any major religious organizations opposed to this kind of science publicly.

-DarkPacMan77-

im the only catholic i kno that has no problem with cloning or the creation of life..... luvkily i make up for it with severe homophobia ....plz dont post anything else religous after this it is mostly a joke

What is wrong with cloning life / altering it?

catholics believe that cloning life is wrong its sorta a pro life deal ive never rly understood it and i do very much disagree with the catholic views of it. If u must then look it up on google the main reason i disagree is because i think parents with deceased children should be given a second chance with that child..... also im a firm beliver in altering human genes for the better and this would boost that factor quite a bit..