Thu Jan 07, 2010 1:12 am by DarkPacMan77
I never said we shouldn't have any security. The message of my post, I thought, was simple: we don't need MORE security. And if we did, we certainly wouldn't need scanners that see through clothing. My point is made clear by a simple thought - "why not use drug/ bomb sniffing dogs?". Between bomb/ drug sniffing dogs, metal detectors, and pat-downs, there's a great chance that you're pretty safe without someone oogling your goodies in a hidden room. The dogs would do a better job at finding drugs and explosives, even inside someone's a** crack whereas the Perv-o-Matic Turbo 5,000 over there is checking out that tattoo on your grandmother's left a** cheek that she got when she was too young but hid from her parents YET it isn't good enough to find her hidden secret...
See, since we're all terrified from the media, grandmother could be hiding a few pounds of C4 plastique explosives in her rear end because she's a terrorist since she owns a hand gun back at home who's been monitored legally via the Patriot Act and put on a no-fly list...
I think we're secure enough as it is without the government making every decision for us, which if you continue to allow things like this to happen, you only further the audacity that people in power will go in order to maintain power.
-DarkPacMan77-

D3ViLsAdvocate wrote:Try shaking the salt harder onto your tongue.