Supashay91 wrote:oh great now johnny is gonna start running his mouth again.
Anyways just cuz I say it was crafted after a penis dosen't mean I fantasize about penises like you.
I'm not gonna argue with a "D' student.
I will go talk to a sandwich with a bit more dexterity than you.

jjgamepro17 wrote:You sure are one to flame. Kid.
And the Wii was based of a remote... Its unique and different and innovative. Heh, the PS3 still has basically the same controller, only now it has that tilt feature that I recall being in a certain controller for the PS1.
Joe Dirté wrote: Go practice falling down and I will be there in a minute
TEIN wrote:and the D- grade was when we actually had spelling class, in 5th grade. I'm in 10th now.
I’m actually a b average student, not a genius but not an idiot.
that’s why I like Nintendo, there trying something new. maybe if Sony actually went through with the boomerang controller it would have at least been a change from the normal.
Supashay91 wrote:jjgamepro17 wrote:You sure are one to flame. Kid.
And the Wii was based of a remote... Its unique and different and innovative. Heh, the PS3 still has basically the same controller, only now it has that tilt feature that I recall being in a certain controller for the PS1.
If I may quote Joe Dirt for a momentJoe Dirté wrote: Go practice falling down and I will be there in a minute
A television remote is not innovative, it's a television remote. The PS3 has a controller that people are familliar with and will be able to relate to. Unless you have spent your entire life on a couch (which I know you have JJ) and know your TV remote like the back of your pudgy hand then it will be hard to adapt to the remote.TEIN wrote:and the D- grade was when we actually had spelling class, in 5th grade. I'm in 10th now.
I’m actually a b average student, not a genius but not an idiot.
that’s why I like Nintendo, there trying something new. maybe if Sony actually went through with the boomerang controller it would have at least been a change from the normal.
What nintendo is doing is going senile with age. If Sony went through with the boomerang controller they would lose millions in sales.
Supashay91 wrote:lol I'm talkin about basic structure, I never once said," my controller can be used as a sword"
justinwoodypond wrote:Who cares what the structure is based off of, it's based on that for a reason. Nintendo wants to reach out to people who don't typically play games. People use TV remotes on a regular basis, they're familiar with them. A typical video game controller is very intimdating to a non-gamer. So why not make a user friendly controller? Just because it isn't the norm doesn't mean it's a dumb idea.
justinwoodypond wrote:$250 is not very expensive so don't even try and use that.
Supashay91 wrote:justinwoodypond wrote:$250 is not very expensive so don't even try and use that.
money isn't the point... but if you wanna get into it, when it comes down to it, if they aren't a savvy gamer and money becomes tight then a bad-ass gaming system isn't an option, I don't have a super hyped up comp or a bad-ass ipod, I am scramblin for money all the time. Were do you live? Beverly Hills?
Supashay91 wrote:I have been saving up for the PS3 for 2 years now, anything extra I get or make gets thrown in the ol' money jar...
oh and when you buy a 360 your not paying for the Console your paying for the name, the same can be said about the Nintendo, so minus the cost of paying for a Nintendo product and it comes out to about 100$
because if it was the "Magnavox wii" no one would care...
Return to PlayStation Portable
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 39 guests