JustinWoodypond wrote:I don't understand that how I'm Persian means that I lived in Iran. My family is from there, so don't go around spouting things you don't know.
Here is what I know:
If you never lived in Iran then you aren't Persian. I don't care where your parents or grandparents are from. I know so many people that claim to be Italian but don't speak the language or have never been near Italy that it's a joke. Bottom line, IF you were born on American soil you are American, end of story. I don't understand why people insist on carrying on traditions from their "home" countries when they seem content in the one they are in, that goes for everybody.
Yea yea yea America is the melting pot made up of different cultures but here is where we tend to forget our history.
When the English settled here they encountered the indians. Those people were made up of many different cultures too. Now you tell me how many are left? Divided we fall, A house divided can not stand. This is where I am coming from and that is my point on diverse cultures. America has it's own culture just like every country on earth does. No one is forced into being American, in fact you can give up your citizenship at any time.
I have acknowledged somewhere on this board that Iran is probably one of the most stable and powerful countries in the middle east capable of producing in the range of a million uniformed soldiers at a moments notice. This fact alone makes Iran something to consider with extreme caution. I state facts and show where I get my info most of the time. If I have ever stated anything wrong about Iran it wasn't because I made it up.
I would say I am an authority at least on this board on the CIA and it's monumental F'ups. I eluded to that in my post before this one. If you think I am attacking "Persians" or the Iranian people then you need to read my words more carefully.
Anyhow, None of what I stated was intended to imply that Iran and its people needed to be wiped from the map or was a direct threat to the US. I just wanted to stick to the facts that Iran wants a nuclear weapon and attaining a nuclear power plant would be a way to attain materials for such a project and that Iran sponsors groups that are considered by the UN and other countries to be terrorist organizations. If this is incorrect then let's set the record straight once and for all.
OBVIOUSLY I have never set foot in Iran I don't have anything against it's people or culture. I just don't think that if Iran did get "the bomb" that it would keep it to itself based on the fact that Iran supplies arms to many groups in the middle east including insurgents in Iraq. Iran provides arms to it's interests and can not be trusted to keep a nuclear weapon to its self. That is the point of bringing this up and why Iran is even in the headlines. It is obvious that if Iran acted directly that there would be hell to pay but has anyone considered if Iran acts indirectly?
If Ahmedinejad didn't say he intended to enrich uranium then please set the record straight.
If he didn't order thousands of centrifuges for the purpose of enriching uranium then please set the record straight.
If anyone hailing from Iran wants to defend that please go right ahead but let's not twist the issue and take/make it personal ok?

The programmers you will one day be looking to hire are the ones reading the tech news sites right now.
And they will remember...
~George Hotz @ $ony